Non-Linear Growth

A glimpse around the next corner; mind the curves.

Working with Friends

Last week I wrote about the value of repeat relationships in the venture capital and private equity business. I used the example of a portfolio company that recently raised capital from a firm we have worked with on a repeat-basis. I intentionally left out the investor’s name as well as the companies knowing that this new investor wanted to more formally announce their investment after labor day.

Well… today, Intel Capital announced a significant investment in Meritage portfolio company IP Commerce. A couple of years ago, Intel joined our syndicate at Crisp Media. Our work there – at the Board and investor levels – has been constructive and collaborative. Crisp is better for it.

I’m excited that Intel has decided to join us at IP Commerce. Special recognition goes to Bavanipratap Rana and Vibhor Rastogi who spearheaded Intel’s work on the transaction. Both worked effectively and collaboratively on the financing all the while doing their jobs by protecting Intel’s interest. We won a few points to, but that is how it should be. In the end, IP Commerce gets more capital, a new supportive investor with lots of leverage points and another effective voice at the table to help the company navigate the huge opportunity it is pursuing.

Some might believe that corporate VC’s like Intel Capital are somehow lesser VC-lifeforms. That has not been my experience. I’d gladly have Intel join the syndicate at any of my companies. Welcome to the team guys and congratulations to IP Commerce for successfully completing this financing. On and up!

Filed under: Payments, Portfolio

Finding the Proverbial Pony

Tech people use the phrase “there is a pony in here somewhere” to describe a tough situation where there is a hidden big opportunity. I hear it most often in the context of a stagnating business that can’t seem to break-out and needs a new catalyst for growth. For example, in businesses that need to make a pivot (btw, the most overused word of 2010/2011 in my mind).

I like the idea behind finding the pony, although not the specific phrase for reasons made clear below. Which leaves a very important question: How do you find the pony? I recommend the following process:

1) Deconstruct Your Assets/Capabilities/Resources: Pull every part of your company, organization, product and systems apart. Absolutely deconstruct each of these parts of the business into their smallest base elements.

2) Get Out of the Office: Plan a day out of the office with no agenda and nothing more than a white-board and the list of your assets/capabilities/resources. Bring in the most creative people you can find from within and outside of your company. Bring in people from spaces that are on the periphery to the space in which you current operate. You want to avoid groupthink so a diversity of backgrounds is better.

3) Evaluate Each Element: As a group, evaluate each of the elements you have isolated. Focus on the raw component parts of your existing product. One of those base elements might be the nugget of a big idea, but was too buried in a system view of your product for you to see it. Also focus your time on elements that are nearest in proximity to revenue streams. That is to say, focus on elements that enable other companies to generate revenue, as opposed to those that will require you to be a vendor selling a back-office product at a “cost”. Prioritize your top ideas.

4) Groups: Break-up into groups, assigning each two ideas. Make sure there is overlap, so that at least two groups cover each idea. Assign each group to come back with a back of the napkin business plan idea for the high priority components you have identified.

5) Research: Take the best ideas and work them.

This exercise won’t automagically generate a whole product or write the business plan, but it might lead you down the right path.

An Aside:

So why don’t I like the phrase? Well, the genesis of the phase “there is a pony in here somewhere” is a joke. It goes something like this:

Once upon a time, there was a mom and dad that had two children. One of them was an optimist, the other a pessimist.   Wanting to understand why the two children were so different, they consulted a psychiatrist, who set up an experiment to help figure it out. The psychiatrist led the first child into a room that was full of brand new toys. Immediately the child burst into tears.   The psychiatrist asked why, and the child replied “all of these toys are new, and if I start playing with them I’m afraid I might break one.”   Obviously, this was the pessimist. So the psychiatrist led the other to a room that was full of horse manure. The child immediately dove in, scooping out handfuls of the disgusting stuff.   The psychiatrist asked why the child was doing that, he replied “with all this horse manure, there has to be a pony around here somewhere, and I’m gonna find it.”

I don’t know about you, but I’d much rather polish a diamond in the rough than find the pony.

Filed under: Random , , , ,

One Surefire Way to Screw up Your Lifestyle Business

Some businesses are designed – maybe even destined – to be owner operated. Industry parlance often refers to these businesses as lifestyle businesses. Wikipedia has a nice definition. They are typically small, profitable, generate cash and enable their owner-operator to sustain a well-above average lifestyle. In some circumstances, they may even make their owner-operator filthy rich over time.

Some people may think that the term lifestyle business is an insult. I couldn’t disagree more. Being the owner-operator of a lifestyle business should be a source of pride; a badge of honor.

As a growth stage investor, I see quite a few lifestyle businesses in our deal log. This type of opportunity finds us because they often meet our high-level screening criteria. They have paying customers, generate meaningful revenue and produce EBITDA and cash every year. They “fit the profile”.

But when I meet with an entrepreneur who is running a lifestyle business, I’m not shy about asking a most important question. It usually goes something like this:

I understand you wish to raise capital to grow your business. But if I’m hearing you correctly, today you own and control nearly 100% of your company. This enables you to lead a balanced life, generate meaningful personal wealth and take great satisfaction from your work. Why would you want to screw all of that up by raising capital?

I mean it too. Raising capital comes with loss of control, changes in lifestyle (read work flexibility) and other issues. More importantly, lifestyle businesses tend to lack one key ingredient that institutional equity investors (particularly growth equity investors) need to generate returns; rapid scalability. Bringing in institutional capital creates an incredible amount of pressure to generate top-line growth. In the context of most lifestyle businesses, that kind of top-line growth is either not achievable or if it is, will so fundamentally alter the character of the business that it will be unrecognizable to the entrepreneur at the end of the process. In short, that pressure will probably do more damage than good from the owner-operators point of view.

So if you are an entrepreneur seeking capital from me and I say something like “You own a great lifestyle business; why on earth would you want to raise capital and screw it up?”, please know I’m coming from an honest place. I’m not insulting you.  I am, however, trying to get you to come to grips with the fact that raising capital may be a surefire way to screw up the good thing you have going.

Filed under: Growth Equity, Investment Selection, Lessons Learned, Raising Capital

Relationships Matter; Repeat Relationships Matter More

From what I’m told by my more senior Partners, the venture and private equity business used to be clubby. That is to say that business between firms was done on the basis of relationships and repeat interactions. Bad behavior was held in check by the small size of the industry. Financings and co-investment relationships got done on the basis of a handshake.

In pockets, that dynamic surely still exists, but with the industry having expanded so greatly both in terms of the number of firms and the number of professionals in the late ’90s, it has been harder to find. Two recessions in ten years hasn’t helped, nor has the dismal ten-year returns of the VC an PE asset classes, which has caused firms to scratch and claw for every ounce of return they can extract. All of this has caused the sharp elbows to come out. As my Partner Jack likes to say:

There is alot of schoolyard thuggery. The seventh graders think it is their right to beat up on the fourth grader. No matter what grade you are in, there is always someone bigger than you on the playground.

It is worth calling out when a transaction doesn’t turn into a knife fight. Without naming names (saving that for later), we recently brought a new investor into one of our companies. I have personally worked with this firm before. We don’t just have a relationship, we have a repeat relationship.  While there were terms to be negotiated, the process was filled with a couple of key ingredients; trust, respect, admiration and an understanding that our work together is multi-threaded and won’t end at this transaction.

The result: A speedy and fair transaction that everyone around the table is happy with and where everyone left a little something on the table. No sharp elbows; no fighting over nickels and dimes; the way it should be. It is the repeat relationship that made all the difference.

Filed under: Uncategorized

Our Sale of Masergy Communications

In late July, my Partners and I at Meritage announced that our portfolio company Masergy Communications had agreed to be acquired by ABRY Partners. I deferred posting congrats to the Masergy team because as they say, it ain’t closed until…

Well, it closed, despite really testy public market conditions, which would have derailed lesser companies from completing a sale. ABRY bought a fine, fine business here and will now have the opportunity to work with what I think is one of the most capable management teams in the communications segment. Masergy’s CEO, Chris MacFarland is a stud. He’s supported by a fantastic team, including Rob Bodnar, the Chief Financial Officer, who helped navigate the Company through some pretty choppy financial markets over the past six years.

Masergy has been a real pioneer in the communications segment; one of the first to virtualize the network by separating ownership of transport infrastructure from the services and management interfaces that overlay the network. The platform they have built will scale really well, no matter how they choose to continue to grow the business; organically or via acquisition.

As for us investors; we did alright on the deal too. We’re proud of the Masergy team, of the company they built and of the outcome we were able to achieve for our limited partners. Good luck to Chris and team under new ownership!

Filed under: Portfolio

My Twitter Feed

  • Boy that Zynga IPO sure is under-performing they say. After all, its only a $7 BILLION MARKET CAP COMPANY!!!! What a failure. #sarcasm 1 month ago
  • I've pocket dialed about 15 people in the past 24 hours. Sorry to all targeted... 2 months ago
  • Just out of Warren Miller movie "... Like there's no tomorrow". Winter on! 2 months ago
  • Trapped in steerage at Laguardia. Time to get off the plane folks. 3 months ago
  • Long week; my fumes are running on fumes. 3 months ago
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.